Improve new type discussion template #45
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MattiSG
reviewed
Jul 3, 2024
|
Please handle conflicts and failing tests before re-requesting review 🙂 |
clementbiron
force-pushed
the
improve-new-type-discussion-template
branch
3 times, most recently
from
9eba574 to
1c77ef9
Compare
MattiSG
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2024
Co-authored-by: Matti Schneider <matti@opentermsarchive.org>
Co-authored-by: Matti Schneider <matti@opentermsarchive.org>
clementbiron
force-pushed
the
improve-new-type-discussion-template
branch
from
3abe1f7 to
1d6e093
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Improve the template to create a discussion for adding new terms type. This can be tested on my fork here.
You can see an example of the result of the discussion opened with this template at this address.