Merge upstream

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -18,6 +18,16 @@ All changes that impact users of this module are documented in this file, in the
 - Add leading jurisdiction emoji for legal references
 - Add legal references and `also known as` data
 
+## 1.2.1 - 2024-08-12
+
+_Full changeset and discussions: [#61](https://github.com/OpenTermsArchive/terms-types/pull/61)._
+
+> Development of this release was supported by the [NGI0 Entrust Fund](https://nlnet.nl/entrust), a fund established by [NLnet](https://nlnet.nl/) with financial support from the European Commission's [Next Generation Internet](https://www.ngi.eu) programme, under the aegis of DG CNECT under grant agreement N°101069594. [Learn more](https://nlnet.nl/project/TOSDR-OTA/) on the NLNet website.
+
+### Changed
+
+- Update dependencies
+
 ## 1.2.0 - 2024-07-15
 
 _Full changeset and discussions: [#57](https://github.com/OpenTermsArchive/terms-types/pull/57)._

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ If you need to track some terms for a service, you might encounter cases when no
 
 ## Process
 
-### Define the tryptich
+### Define the triptych
 
-Since each service provider can come up with its own choice of name for the same terms types, we first have to [define the tryptich](./README.md#how-to-define-the-tryptich) that describes unambiguously the type of these terms.
+Since each service provider can come up with its own choice of name for the same terms types, we first have to [define the triptych](./README.md#how-to-define-the-triptych) that describes unambiguously the type of these terms.
 
-Once you have defined the tryptich for the terms you intend to track, double-check that it does not already exist in the [database](./termsTypes.json). If it does, use the associated type for tracking 🙂
+Once you have defined the triptych for the terms you intend to track, double-check that it does not already exist in the [database](./termsTypes.json). If it does, use the associated type for tracking 🙂
 
 ### Open a discussion
 
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ If no discussion seems to match the type you are interested in adding, [start a
 
 Propose a unique and descriptive name for the new terms type.
 
-It should be the most commonly used and most internationally understandable for this type. It doesn't have to, and probably should not, match the service-provided name. Make use of tools such as Google Trends, Linguee and thesaurus to find the name that strikes the best balance between genericity, precision and multilingualism.
+It should be the most commonly used and most internationally understandable for this type. It doesn't have to, and probably should not, match the service-provided name. Make use of tools such as Google Trends, Linguee and thesaurus to find the name that strikes the best balance between generality, precision and multilingualism.
 
 > For example, the “Imprint” type is [called this way](https://github.com/OpenTermsArchive/engine/issues/801) as a balance between the French “mentions légales”, the German “impressum”, and other considerations.
 
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ References will then be listed in the type definition, with their URL and a titl
 
 ### Build consensus
 
-Publicise your suggestion across Open Terms Archive channels and engage the community. Throughout the discussion, the name and the tryptich should be challenged, taking into account international perspectives on phrasings and the variety of definitions across jurisdictions.
+Publicise your suggestion across Open Terms Archive channels and engage the community. Throughout the discussion, the name and the triptych should be challenged, taking into account international perspectives on phrasings and the variety of definitions across jurisdictions.
 
 In order to ensure global relevance, your suggestion will only be considered for inclusion when there are at least three examples of such terms, each from different service providers. You are welcome to provide several examples on your own.
 
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ In order to ensure global relevance, your suggestion will only be considered for
 Once:
 
 - at least three examples from different service providers have been given;
-- a consensus has been reached on the tryptich;
+- a consensus has been reached on the triptych;
 - a consensus has been reached on the name;
 - at least 2 weeks have elapsed since the opening of the discussion, to ensure visibility throughout the community.
 

README.md

@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ Examples:
 - `"Hyperlinks Policy" : { "also known as": [ "Links Policy", "Linking Policy" ], … }`
 - `"Whistleblower Policy": { "also known as": [ "Whistleblower Protections" ], … }`
 
-### Tryptich
+### Triptych
 
-In order to guide usage and disambiguate synonyms, each terms type is characterised by a tryptich along the three dimensions of the `commitment` that is being taken in it:
+In order to guide usage and disambiguate synonyms, each terms type is characterised by a triptych along the three dimensions of the `commitment` that is being taken in it:
 
 - the `writer` of the document, in most cases the service provider itself;
 - the targeted `audience` whose rights and duties are defined in the associated terms;
@@ -113,15 +113,15 @@ Examples:
 }
 ```
 
-## How to define the tryptich
+## How to define the triptych
 
-To identify the tryptich of specific terms, answer the following questions:
+To identify the triptych of specific terms, answer the following questions:
 
 1. Who is responsible for creating and maintaining those terms? Most often, it will be the `service provider` itself. Sometimes, while still being the service provider, it could be that only providers from a certain industry could write such terms, such as `transportation operator`.
 2. Who is the target audience whose rights and duties are defined? Often, it will be the `end user`, but it can also be the `commercial partners` or `business users`, for example.
 3. Which information or interaction precisely is constrained by those terms? For example, the `end users’ personal data`, or maybe the `privileged seller status programme`. Try to be as specific as possible, as this precision enables distinguishing between otherwise similar types.
 
-After having answered these questions, if reading out loud the tryptich, it sounds right to say that **“these terms describe how the `<writer>` commits to handle the `<object>` for its `<audience>`”**.
+After having answered these questions, if reading out loud the triptych, it sounds right to say that **“these terms describe how the `<writer>` commits to handle the `<object>` for its `<audience>`”**.
 
 ## Add new terms types