Improve es-ES translation

[tupaschoal]

Applying for issue(s):

• Strings 0024, 0534, 0534, 0537, 0582 #1773
• Strings 6333-6334 #1781
• Strings 6335-6346 #1786
• Strings 6347 and 6348 #1789
• Strings 6350–6355 #1804
• Strings 6356-6357 #1809
• Strings 6361–6362 #1821
• String 6363 #1826
• Strings 6327–6328 #1725
• String 6304 #1675

Also improving some translations and adding some from original fields.

(This is sourced from #1834 because I think it's great)

[frenchiveruti]

Thank you for your time, in the future if I do a translation of the files I'll just tag you and send you the file. I have zero idea on how to make git work.

[tupaschoal]

If you don't want to play around with git, the best way is to fork, do the changes in a small time window, submit the PR and then delete the fork once it is merged. That way you don't have to worry about rebasing or using the command line interface.

[frenchiveruti]

Yeah but doing that over and over gets really tiresome to be honest.
I did that in the beginning but it got old so quickly...

[frenchiveruti]

It's just because I can't really sync the upstream git of OpenRCT2/Localisation with my fork, if I had some script to do it automatically every time I am about to translate, there would be no conflicts really.
But I have 0 idea on how that's done.

[tupaschoal]

If you have git on the command line all you need to do is git fetch upstream then git rebase upstream/master.

Make sure you always submit a PR from a branch, and this is probably all the commands you'll need to use.

[Gymnasiast]

You can also just go here: https://github.com/OpenRCT2/Localisation/blob/master/data/language/es-ES.txt and click edit. No need to do difficult things with rebasing or anything.

[frenchiveruti]

Alright.
By the way the name of the PR should have es-ES at the beginning, right?
So the issues get the checkmarks on the es-ES checkbox.

[Gymnasiast]

The commits should have the form es-ES: Apply #1234 (or es-ES: Apply #1234, #1235 if it addresses multiple issues). For the PR, it doesn't matter too much. But it's probably easiest to use that form for both anyway.

I always have to manually check the checkboxes. But using the above form means that a reference gets posted on the issue, which makes it easier to keep track of.

[frenchiveruti]

Ah okay, I thought it was automagic