-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SetterMustExist Not Ignoring Synthetic Fields #139
Comments
can you please have a look at this? I think this is a very quick one :) |
issue fixed and released see latest release. |
👏 Thank you very much. Works like a charm |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello,
We use this library alongside of pitest for mutation checks. Recently we have upgraded to pitest >= 1.6.2 which now currently fails to run mutation coverage because when pitest injects their private field probes into the classes that openpojo is testing against, it's causing it to fail due to it not finding a setter for these synthetic fields. I opened an issue in the pitest plugin here: hcoles/pitest#873. Their suggestion was to have openpojo ignore synthetic fields. I noticed for the Getter rule, that was already in place: https://github.com/OpenPojo/openpojo/releases/tag/openpojo-0.8.6, but not the for SetterMustExistRule. I created a PR to fix this issue: #138
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: