AeroDyn: Improved coning and prebend modeling in future BEM #1509
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request ready to be merged.
Feature or improvement description
This pull request:
BEM_Mod
to switch between BEM implementationsDocumentation, test cases, and support for large yaw angles will be provided in future pull request (handled by another project).
Impacted areas of the software
AeroDyn
Test results, if applicable
No change in the r-test results
Verifcation results
Test results for the IEA 15MW (straight blade) at 9.0m/s and 6.4 RPM, use WakeMod1=1(legacy BEM), 11 (future BEM) or 3 (OLAF).
Typical input files
Simulations, IEA 15MW (straight blade) at 9.0m/s and 6.4 RPM, 50deg coning:
ConeDriver.zip
Acknowledgments
The work was developped as part of the BAR project (@ptrbortolotti ) and in collaboration with Envision Energy (@bjonkman).