cherry pick code of prompt

[SeanHH86]

What is this feature?

prompt

Why do we need this feature?

merge code

MR Summary:

The summary is added by @codegpt.

This Merge Request removes the conversation feature from the prompt component. Key updates include:

1. Deleted conversation-related functions in prompt.go, such as NewConversation, ListConversationsByUserID, and others.
2. Removed conversation-related routes in api.go.
3. Added prompt_ce.go to handle conditional compilation for non-enterprise and non-SaaS builds, effectively stubbing out conversation methods.
4. Updated tests in prompt_test.go by removing conversation-related tests.

[starship-github]

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

[starship-github]

Review Comments And Suggestions:

• component/prompt.go

  • Comments:
    • Removal of conversation-related functions and regexp import might break existing functionality relying on these conversations. Ensure that this functionality is either deprecated or migrated.

• api/handler/prompt.go

  • Comments:
    • Large block of code related to conversation functionality has been removed. Ensure this is intentional and verified, as it might impact existing features.

• api/router/api.go

  • Comments:
    • Routes for conversation functionality have been removed. Confirm this aligns with the intended feature changes and no existing functionality is affected.

• component/prompt_ce.go

  • Comments:
    • All functions return nil without any implementation. This might be intentional for a stub, but if these functions are expected to have logic, this is a critical issue.
  • Suggestions:

    // Example implementation for NewConversation
    // This is a placeholder. Actual logic needs to be implemented based on requirements.
    func (c *promptComponentImpl) NewConversation(ctx context.Context, req types.ConversationTitleReq) (*database.PromptConversation, error) {
        // Implement logic here
        return &database.PromptConversation{}, nil
    }
    

• component/prompt_ce.go

  • Comments:
    • Missing error handling and business logic in all methods could lead to unimplemented features or silent failures.
  • Suggestions:

    // Suggestion to add error handling or a TODO comment for future implementation.
    // Example for NewConversation method:
    func (c *promptComponentImpl) NewConversation(ctx context.Context, req types.ConversationTitleReq) (*database.PromptConversation, error) {
        // TODO: Implement the business logic
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("method not implemented")
    }
    

MR Evaluation:

This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate.

After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 90.

Analysis for the evaluation score:

• The code change may not fully implement the business requirements in the MR description.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

About Us:

Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules.

[starship-github]

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.