add go integrate test #1792

luky116 · 2023-07-22T07:19:07Z

cr-gpt · 2023-07-22T07:19:21Z

src/net/src/thread_pool.cc

+  }
+  wsignal_.wait(lock, [this]() {
+    return queue_.size() < max_queue_size_ || should_stop(); });
+//  wsignal_.wait(lock, [this]() { return should_stop(); });

  if (!should_stop()) {
    queue_.emplace(func, arg);


Here's a brief review of the code patch you provided:

The addition of logging the queue size and max queue size when it exceeds the limit is a good improvement for understanding the behavior of the program during execution.

The condition queue_.size() > max_queue_size_ checks if the queue size has exceeded the maximum allowed size. However, it doesn't take any action to handle this situation. Depending on your requirements, you might consider adding logic to handle this case, such as discarding or rejecting new tasks when the queue is full.

The commented line // wsignal_.wait(lock, [this]() { return should_stop(); }); indicates that it was removed from the code patch. If this behavior is intentional and you don't need to check the queue size before waiting, then it is fine. Otherwise, ensure that the removal was not accidental and the existing condition [this]() { return should_stop(); } is sufficient.

It seems that there are no other visible issues or bugs in the provided code patch.

Overall, the reviewed code patch looks appropriate, but further improvements could be made depending on your specific requirements.

cr-gpt · 2023-07-22T09:01:05Z

tests/integration/start_master_and_slave.sh

@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ sed -i '' -e 's|databases : 1|databases : 2|' -e 's|port : 9221|port : 9231|' -e
 ./pika -c ./pika_master.conf
 ./pika -c ./pika_slave.conf
 #ensure both master and slave are ready
-sleep 10
+sleep 10


The code patch you provided seems to be a shell script. Here's a brief review:

It appears that the patch is modifying some configuration files using sed command. The changes include replacing "databases : 1" with "databases : 2" and "port : 9221" with "port : 9231". Make sure the paths to the configuration files are correct.

After the configuration changes, it starts two instances of an executable called "pika," passing two different configuration files (pika_master.conf and pika_slave.conf) using the -c option.

There is a sleep command with a duration of 10 seconds. It might be added to wait for the master and slave instances to initialize properly before proceeding. Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for the sleep.

Finally, there is a line with no visible changes: sleep 10. It seems to be duplicated, and the comment indicates that there should be a newline at the end of the file. Check if this line is necessary or remove it if not.

Overall, the code patch looks fine, but without more context or information about the purpose and requirements of the code, it's challenging to suggest specific improvements or identify potential bug risks.

cr-gpt · 2023-07-22T16:32:48Z

.github/workflows/pika.yml

+          cd ../tests/integration/
+          chmod +x integrate_test.sh 
+          sh integrate_test.sh


Here are some observations and suggestions for the code patch:

In all three jobs (build_on_ubuntu, build_on_centos, build_on_macos), there is a duplication of steps related to running Go E2E tests. It could be abstracted into a reusable template to avoid repetition.

The file paths used in script execution (python3 ../tests/integration/pika_replication_test.py and python3 ../tests/unit/Blpop_Brpop_test.py) should be validated to ensure they exist in the expected locations.

It's recommended to specify the exact version of actions being used (e.g., actions/checkout@v3) to keep the behavior consistent, rather than relying on the default version.

Consider providing more information or details in the comments about what each job and step does, especially if it's not immediately clear from the context.

Overall, the code patch appears to be fine as long as the referenced files and directories exist and are correctly placed.

Note: It's helpful to provide more details or specific areas you want to address for a more comprehensive review.

cr-gpt · 2023-07-22T16:34:40Z

src/pika_list.cc

@@ -560,7 +561,7 @@ void RPopCmd::Do(std::shared_ptr<Slot> slot) {
  std::vector<std::string> elements;
  rocksdb::Status s = slot->db()->RPop(key_, count_, &elements);
  if (s.ok()) {
-    res_.AppendArrayLenUint64(elements.size());
+    res_.AppendArrayLen(elements.size());
    for (const auto& element : elements) {
      res_.AppendString(element);
    }


Based on the code patch you provided, here are some observations and suggestions for improvement:

Code Formatting: The code formatting in the patch seems inconsistent. Make sure to maintain a consistent style throughout the codebase for better readability.

Error Handling: Currently, the code assumes that slot->db()->LPop() and slot->db()->RPop() will always return an 'ok' status. It's good practice to handle potential errors explicitly. Check the return status (s) and handle any errors appropriately.

Appending Array Length: The code uses res_.AppendArrayLen(elements.size()) to append the array length to the response. Assuming this is the correct behavior, it's important to review the implementation of AppendArrayLen() to ensure it handles the length correctly.

Looping over Elements: The loop that appends elements to the response looks fine, assuming that the logic inside res_.AppendString(element) is correct. Make sure to review that method as well.

Overall Functionality: Without understanding the context and purpose of the code, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive review. Consider providing more information on what the code aims to achieve and its usage context so that a more thorough analysis can be done.

Remember, a code review should include not only identifying bugs but also reviewing design choices, performance considerations, and overall code quality.

cr-gpt · 2023-07-22T16:41:41Z

tests/integration/csanning_test.go

+			Expect(cursor).NotTo(BeZero())
+		})
+	})
+})


Overall, the code patch appears to be a test suite for scanning commands in a Redis client. Here are some observations and suggestions for improvement:

Package Name and Organization: Ensure that the package name pika_integration aligns with the directory structure where this code resides. Verify if this is intentional or needs to be updated.

Imports:

The use of relative imports (. "github.com/bsm/ginkgo/v2" and . "github.com/bsm/gomega") can make the code less readable and harder to understand dependencies. It's recommended to use standard import statements.

Update the Redis client import to the latest version (github.com/go-redis/redis/v8) as per your project requirements.

Testing Framework: The code appears to be using the Ginkgo testing framework. Make sure you have the necessary setup to run Ginkgo tests and associated reports.

Test Case Design:

The test cases seem reasonable and cover different scan types (Scan, ScanType, SScan, HScan, ZScan).

Consider adding more specific assertions within each test case to verify the expected behaviors. For example, checking specific keys/values returned by the scan commands.

It's also good practice to include negative test cases to validate error scenarios.

Test Execution Environment: Ensure that the code executes in an appropriate testing environment with Redis accessible and properly configured.

Note: A code review is typically more effective when reviewing the entire context, including other relevant files, libraries used, and project-specific requirements.

cr-gpt · 2023-07-22T16:48:57Z

tests/integration/slowlog_test.go

+			Expect(len(result)).NotTo(BeZero())
+		})
+	})
+})


The code patch you provided appears to be a test file for the "Slowlog Commands" in a package called "pika_integration." Here are some observations:

Package Import: The import statements at the beginning of the code seem to be correct.

Context Usage: The usage of context.TODO() is appropriate for creating a context instance.

Test Setup and Teardown: The BeforeEach function sets up a Redis client and flushes the database before each test, while the AfterEach function closes the client after each test. This ensures a clean starting point for each test and proper resource management.

Test Case: The SlowLogGet test case performs various operations related to the Redis slow log. It sets a configuration value, resets the slow log, sets a key-value pair, and then retrieves the slow log entries. The expectations for errors and the length of the result are asserted.

Based on this limited code snippet, it's challenging to provide specific bug risks or improvement suggestions. However, here are some general recommendations for code review:

Ensure error handling: Make sure all potential errors are properly handled and not ignored. Check for errors explicitly and handle them accordingly.

Use meaningful variable names: Consider using descriptive names for variables to improve code readability and maintainability.

Mock external dependencies: If possible, you might want to consider mocking the Redis client or similar external dependencies to achieve better isolation during unit testing.

Add more comprehensive test cases: Consider adding additional test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases.

Remember that a comprehensive code review requires examining the entire codebase, its design, logic flow, and adherence to best practices.

cr-gpt · 2023-07-23T01:20:31Z

tests/integration/main_test.go

+func TestPika(t *testing.T) {
+	RegisterFailHandler(Fail)
+	RunSpecs(t, "Pika integration test")
+}


The provided code snippet appears to be a test file for Pika integration. Here are a few observations and suggestions:

Package Name: The package name "pika_integration" seems appropriate if it aligns with the purpose of the code.

Import Statements: Check if all the imported packages are necessary and being used in the code.

Testing Framework: The code imports the "github.com/bsm/ginkgo/v2" and "github.com/bsm/gomega" packages, which suggest the usage of the Ginkgo testing framework. Confirm that this is intentional and the desired testing framework.

Test Function: The TestPika function is the entry point for the test suite. Ensure that it covers the intended scope and tests the desired functionality.

RegisterFailHandler: The RegisterFailHandler function is used to register a failure handler for the tests. Verify if it's required, and if yes, ensure it's implemented correctly.

RunSpecs: The RunSpecs function is responsible for executing the test suite. Make sure it's appropriately configured and includes all the necessary specifications.

Without further context or the actual implementation code, it's challenging to provide more specific feedback. It's crucial to review the implementation details, assertions, and other test cases to identify possible bugs or optimizations.

cr-gpt · 2023-07-23T01:47:02Z

tests/integration/csanning_test.go

+			Expect(cursor).NotTo(BeZero())
+		})
+	})
+})


Overall, the code patch appears to be a test suite for scanning commands in a Redis database using the Pika integration library. Here are some observations and suggestions for improvement:

Package Name: It is recommended to use lowercase letters for package names to follow Go naming conventions. Consider renaming "package pika_integration" to "package pikaintegration".

Import Statements: The import statements contain both dot-imports ("." imports) and version-specific imports. It is generally discouraged to use dot-imports as they can make the code harder to read and understand. Instead, import the packages explicitly without the dot. Also, consider using the latest version of the imported packages if there have been updates since the code was last reviewed.

Test Setup and Teardown: The BeforeEach and AfterEach functions provide setup and teardown logic for each test case. It's good to ensure that the tests start with a clean state and close any resources after execution.

Test Cases: The code includes multiple test cases for different scan commands such as Scan, ScanType, SScan, HScan, and ZScan. Each test case performs some operations on the Redis database and verifies the results using Expect assertions. This approach is reasonable for testing the functionality of scanning commands.

Error Handling: The code handles errors by using Expect functions from the Gomega library to assert that an error does not occur. However, it could be beneficial to include informative error messages when an error occurs. This would help with identifying the cause of the failure during test execution.

Test Data: The test cases populate the Redis database with test data before executing the scan commands. It might be helpful to include additional scenarios with different types of data sets to cover a wider range of possible edge cases.

Test Coverage: Verify if all relevant scenarios related to the scanning commands have been covered in the test cases. Ensure that both successful and failure cases are included.

Code Documentation: Consider adding comments or function/method documentation to describe the purpose of the code patch, the role of individual functions, and any important details that might be useful for maintenance or future modifications.

Remember to validate this code review independently before applying any suggested changes, as I can only provide a general assessment based on the provided code snippet.

cr-gpt · 2023-07-23T03:50:01Z

.github/workflows/pika.yml

+          cd ../tests/integration/
+          chmod +x integrate_test.sh 
+          sh integrate_test.sh


Code Review:

The code appears to set up Go using the actions/setup-go action in each of the jobs (Set up Go step). This ensures that the required Go version (1.19) is installed before running the tests.

In the cache dependencies step, the actions/cache action is used to cache dependencies, which can improve the speed of subsequent workflow runs by reusing the cached dependencies.

There are multiple steps to run Python tests in each job, one for pika replication test and another for Blpop_Brpop test. These steps seem fine, assuming the test scripts are correctly implemented and located at the specified paths.

Additionally, there is a separate step to run Go E2E tests in each job. The integrate_test.sh script is being invoked in each case.

Lastly, the code uses the actions/checkout action to checkout the repository in each job, which allows the workflow to access the repository's files.

Improvement Suggestions:

It seems that the steps to set up Go and run Go E2E tests (Run Go E2E Tests) are duplicated in each job. You can consider moving these steps to a separate reusable job template or creating a reusable GitHub Action, so that they don't need to be repeated multiple times.

Consider adding more error handling and validation within the script files (integrate_test.sh, test scripts) to handle any failures or unexpected scenarios gracefully.

Ensure that the required versions of Go, Python, and other dependencies are accurately specified and compatible with the tests and project requirements.

It may be helpful to include additional logging and output statements within the workflow to provide better visibility and understanding of the execution process.

Bug Risk:
Without having access to the content of the integrate_test.sh script and the actual test scripts, it's challenging to determine if there are any specific bug risks. It's important to thoroughly review and test the scripts to ensure their correctness and reliability.

Overall, the code seems to follow a reasonable structure for running tests using different job configurations. However, a more detailed review of the actual test implementations would be necessary to identify any potential issues or improvements specific to the tests themselves.

cr-gpt · 2023-07-23T05:53:24Z

.github/workflows/pika.yml

+          cd ../tests/integration/
+          chmod +x integrate_test.sh 
+          sh integrate_test.sh


Overall, the code patch appears to add Go E2E tests and make use of the actions/setup-go action to set up the Go environment. Here are some improvements and potential bug risks that you may want to consider:

Specify a stable Go version: It's generally recommended to specify a stable Go version rather than just 1.19, as versions can change over time. Consider using a specific version that is known to work well with your code.

Clarify the purpose of the cache dependencies step: In the provided code patch, there is a step named "cache dependencies" that uses actions/cache. It's not clear what exactly is being cached and why. Make sure you're caching necessary dependencies to improve build times, but avoid caching directories or files that change frequently.

Review integration test script: Take a closer look at the integrate_test.sh script that is being invoked in both the build_on_centos job and one of the existing jobs. Verify that the script handles errors properly and provides meaningful output.

Maintain consistency across jobs: Ensure that similar steps, such as setting up Go, are consistent across different jobs if they serve the same purpose. In the given code patch, the Set up Go step is duplicated in multiple jobs. Consider factoring out common steps into reusable actions to avoid code duplication and simplify maintenance.

Check for proper error handling and logging: Ensure that all the scripts and commands being executed have proper error handling and logging mechanisms. This will help detect and troubleshoot issues more effectively during the CI/CD process.

Test and verify the overall pipeline flow: Run the modified pipeline and verify that the new Go E2E tests run successfully and produce the expected results. Also, ensure that any existing functionality is not disrupted by the changes introduced.

Remember to thoroughly test and validate the modified pipeline in a staging or non-production environment before deploying it to production.

longfar-ncy · 2023-07-28T03:56:34Z

tests/integration/go.mod

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+module pika-integration
+
+go 1.19


是必须要1.19或以上吗？1.18可以吗？

* Optimized code logic (#1834) * fix:delete consensus level (#1844) * delete_consensus_level * Update pika.conf (#1854) * fix:delete_consensus_level (#1852) * delete_consensus_level * fix:shutdown&&slaveof no one too slow (#1859) * fix_slow_shut_down * add go integrate test (#1792) * add go integrate test * add go integrate test * add go integrate test * add go integrate test * temp test * temp test * temp test * temp test * temp test * temp test * add test * temp test * temp test * add tcl * add tcl * reformat code * add tcl * reformat code * add tcl * reformat code * add tcl * fix setxx * fix setxx * add tcl * add tcl * fix: fix some compile error (#1861) Co-authored-by: wangshaoyi <wangshaoyi@meituan.com> * change-version * feat: add diskrecovery command (#1843) * Add diskrecovery command * Add diskrecovery command --------- Co-authored-by: chejinge <945997690@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Yuecai Liu <38887641+luky116@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: wangshao1 <30471730+wangshao1@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: wangshaoyi <wangshaoyi@meituan.com>

* add go integrate test * add go integrate test * add go integrate test * add go integrate test * temp test * temp test * temp test * temp test * temp test * temp test * add test * temp test * temp test * add tcl * add tcl * reformat code * add tcl * reformat code * add tcl * reformat code * add tcl * fix setxx * fix setxx * add tcl * add tcl

add go integrate test

37558c4

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 22, 2023

View reviewed changes

luky116 added 6 commits July 22, 2023 15:27

add go integrate test

eff05af

add go integrate test

0f5351c

add go integrate test

0013131

temp test

958730b

temp test

c3a25f4

temp test

fc0d3dd

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 22, 2023

View reviewed changes

luky116 added 5 commits July 22, 2023 17:02

temp test

02be838

temp test

444e6d3

temp test

cb8bda1

add test

301e599

temp test

780da7f

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 22, 2023

View reviewed changes

temp test

ad89658

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 22, 2023

View reviewed changes

luky116 added 4 commits July 23, 2023 00:35

add tcl

de90d53

Merge remote-tracking branch 'pika/unstable' into addGoIntegrateTest

da62b85

add tcl

859436b

reformat code

663c12c

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 22, 2023

View reviewed changes

add tcl

cdd09f8

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 22, 2023

View reviewed changes

luky116 added 2 commits July 23, 2023 09:17

reformat code

e4a8048

add tcl

86501ad

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 23, 2023

View reviewed changes

reformat code

13755aa

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 23, 2023

View reviewed changes

add tcl

db1428f

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 23, 2023

View reviewed changes

luky116 added 4 commits July 23, 2023 13:21

fix setxx

c1f6c83

fix setxx

bc91da9

add tcl

d50a0f5

add tcl

4f83245

cr-gpt bot reviewed Jul 23, 2023

View reviewed changes

luky116 changed the title ~~[WIP] add go integrate test~~ add go integrate test Jul 23, 2023

yaoyinnan added the enhancement label Jul 27, 2023

longfar-ncy reviewed Jul 28, 2023

View reviewed changes

tests/integration/go.mod

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@

module pika-integration

go 1.19

Copy link

Contributor

longfar-ncy Jul 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

是必须要1.19或以上吗？1.18可以吗？

chejinge approved these changes Aug 3, 2023

View reviewed changes

Mixficsol approved these changes Aug 3, 2023

View reviewed changes

Mixficsol merged commit 9a5e376 into OpenAtomFoundation:unstable Aug 3, 2023

yaoyinnan approved these changes Aug 3, 2023

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

add go integrate test #1792

add go integrate test #1792

luky116 commented Jul 22, 2023 •

edited

Loading

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

cr-gpt bot Jul 23, 2023

cr-gpt bot Jul 23, 2023

cr-gpt bot Jul 23, 2023

cr-gpt bot Jul 23, 2023

longfar-ncy Jul 28, 2023

add go integrate test #1792

add go integrate test #1792

Conversation

luky116 commented Jul 22, 2023 • edited Loading

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Jul 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Jul 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Jul 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Jul 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Jul 23, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

longfar-ncy Jul 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

luky116 commented Jul 22, 2023 •

edited

Loading