-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs - #208 document new ghost object behavior #281
Conversation
…ing it too far with the examples)
Form is OK, the only thing that's unclear to me is that if in the end there's any way to not skip the constructor. |
@fntlnz you can actually call the constructor, if you want, but since we're setting all the state, is that an actual use-case? |
@fntlnz added block to clarify that :-) |
Grammar improvements to lazy loading ghost object docs
@Ocramius at the moment I don't see any use case for that. But probably because is stated "the constructor is not called" one may think something like: "hey I have to proxy that old legacy painful object with a lot of business logic poured into the controller and I want to actually call it to be sure that the things are going as before but here's it's written that the controller isn't called. Unfortunately I can't use this tool :( ". That's quite a edge case and son of poorly designed code of course but, shit happens. |
…return type hint
…Interface` instance
@fntlnz thanks for bringing it up :-) |
…-behavior Docs - #208 document new ghost object behavior
Provides docs for #208