Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

should we be linking Requirements with specific test cases? #6

Closed
anantshri opened this issue Sep 13, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

should we be linking Requirements with specific test cases? #6

anantshri opened this issue Sep 13, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@anantshri
Copy link
Collaborator

The discussion at #5 got me thinking should we be linking ASVS Requirements with specific test cases in the MSTG.

advatage: we can keep generic Requirements and still have detailed checks based on OS specific testcases.

@thec00n
Copy link
Collaborator

thec00n commented Sep 13, 2016

I think that's a good approach.

@muellerberndt
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, definitely!

Get Outlook for Android

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:54 PM +0800, "Gerhard" notifications@github.com wrote:

I think that's a good approach.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 13, 2016

ok agreed, but this means that we still have a long road ahead with this project ;)

commjoen pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2018
Update 0x15-V8-Resiliency_Against_Reverse_Engineering_Requirements.md
commjoen pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2019
Update 0x15-V8-Resiliency_Against_Reverse_Engineering_Requirements.md
cpholguera pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2020
Update 0x91-Appendix-B_References.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants