Fix pnpm warning,issue#969 #980
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a series of changes across various YAML and JSON configuration files. A blank line was added at the beginning of Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i actually have added that in both frontend and cspell,it seems there is no need of that in cspell so i am changing that
|
Hey @srinjoy933, today is this task's deadline. I still don't think this PR solves the problem. Please let me know if you have time to address it. |
|
yes ,i will try to resolve the issue before the deadline,and one more thing can you clarify that except the issue description given any more clarification can be given on that issue? |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
status (1)
86-86: Fix typo in commit message.There's a duplication in the commit message which appears to be a typo:
Apply labels aApply labels automatically at issue creation #888utomatically at issue creation, issue #888This should be corrected in future commit messages for better readability and history tracking.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
schema/tests/data/chapter/negative/blog-empty.yaml(2 hunks)status(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- schema/tests/data/chapter/negative/blog-empty.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (4)
status (4)
15-16: PR commits address the stated objective of fixing pnpm warnings.The commits on lines 15-16 directly relate to the PR objective described in the PR summary. Commit
da72ff1specifically mentions "Fix pnpm warning,issue#969" which aligns with the main goal of removing@types/date-fnsfrom thedevDependenciessection inpackage.jsonto address the pnpm warning.
9-9: YAML formatting changes support better maintainability.The additional commits related to YAML formatting and disabling yamlfmt demonstrate attention to code quality beyond just fixing the immediate issue. These formatting improvements can help with overall repository maintainability.
Also applies to: 12-12
1-225: The git history provides good visibility into project development.This git history shows active development with regular commits, version tagging, and branch management. The repository follows good practices with:
- Descriptive commit messages that reference issue numbers
- Proper version tagging (0.1.x series)
- Feature branches for developing specific issues
- Regular dependency updates
These practices contribute to a maintainable and well-structured project.
7-10:❓ Verification inconclusive
Ensure PR branches are properly cleaned up after merging.
The git history shows multiple merge commits and branch operations related to the issue-969 branch. After this PR is merged, consider cleaning up the feature branch to maintain a cleaner repository history.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the branch has been merged to main git branch --merged main | grep "srinjoy933/issue-969" # If the above command returns the branch name, it has been merged and can be safely deletedLength of output: 54
Action Required: Verify the merge status of the issue-969 branch before proceeding with cleanup
- The initial script produced no output, which leaves it unclear whether the
srinjoy933/issue-969branch has indeed been merged intomain.- Please run the updated shell script below to determine if the branch has been merged:
#!/bin/bash commit_hash=$(git rev-parse srinjoy933/issue-969 2>/dev/null) if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "Branch srinjoy933/issue-969 not found." exit 1 fi if git merge-base --is-ancestor "$commit_hash" main; then echo "Branch srinjoy933/issue-969 has been successfully merged into main." else echo "Branch srinjoy933/issue-969 has NOT been merged into main." fi
- Once you’ve confirmed that the
issue-969branch is merged, please clean up the feature branch to maintain a cleaner repository history.
|
is this ok? |
|
i am not able to understand cause of this conflict resolution |
srinjoy933
force-pushed
the
srinjoy933/issue-969
branch
from
ec1bc39 to
dfc556b
Compare
|
|
@arkid15r can you review it once? |
|
The PR still has conflicts and doesn't seem to resolve this issue. Closing this out. |
Resolves #969
To resolve this, I modified the package.json file by removing @types/date-fns from the devDependencies section. Additionally, I updated pnpm-lock.yaml to ensure that @types/date-fns was fully removed from the project.