-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Issues: OP-TED/eForms-SDK
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
LotResult EED fileds are missing in the generated pdf
efx-toolkit
Related to the EFX Toolkit Java library
view-templates
Related to EFX view templates (/view-templates SDK folder).
visualisation
Related to notice visualisation.
#1086
opened Dec 9, 2024 by
tompeeszter
Wrong value for asserts in 'BT-1375-Procedure'
schematrons
Related to the Schematron validation (/schematrons SDK folder)
Strange nesting of BT-761 and BT-76?
notice-types
Related to the notice type definitions (/notice-types).
#1063
opened Nov 12, 2024 by
mdewinne
XML Transformation Issues with BT-127-notice and BT-728-Procedure Fields After SDK Version 1.12 Update
notice-types
Related to the notice type definitions (/notice-types).
#1041
opened Oct 12, 2024 by
skyazid
Question regarding to 'Information about European Union funds'
view-templates
Related to EFX view templates (/view-templates SDK folder).
#1037
opened Oct 7, 2024 by
tompeeszter
PDF visualisation question (labels without data)
view-templates
Related to EFX view templates (/view-templates SDK folder).
#1032
opened Oct 2, 2024 by
tompeeszter
"BT-60-Lot" in notice subtype 16.json seems to be located under the incorrect nodeId
notice-types
Related to the notice type definitions (/notice-types).
#799
opened Jan 10, 2024 by
VirtualSatai
current validation rules only for BT-131(d) and BT-132(d) allow inconsistencies in BT-131(t)/BT-132(t)
efx-toolkit
Related to the EFX Toolkit Java library
validation
Related to notice validation.
#783
opened Dec 11, 2023 by
gabrieledall
Potential duplicate of data elements due to decomposing business terms to fields (BT-157-LotsGroup, BT-271-LotsGroup)
business terms
Clarifications on business terms
fields
Related to field metadata (/fields/fields.json)
#523
opened Jun 12, 2023 by
jpmckinney
ProTip!
Adding no:label will show everything without a label.