Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tcp mss keyword 6355 v10 #10841

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6355

Describe changes:

  • detect/analyzer: add more details for tcp_mss

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#1759

#10826 with even better names with SC prefix, and commit split in 2

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.87%. Comparing base (784ce30) to head (bd3bed6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #10841      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.83%   82.87%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         913      914       +1     
  Lines      246847   246887      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits       204474   204604     +130     
+ Misses      42373    42283      -90     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 64.34% <0.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
suricata-verify 62.10% <90.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 62.32% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 20060

@victorjulien victorjulien added this to the 8.0 milestone Apr 15, 2024
@victorjulien victorjulien merged commit bd3bed6 into OISF:master Apr 16, 2024
47 checks passed
@victorjulien
Copy link
Member

Merged in #10852, thanks!

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @0xEniola

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants