Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][mig] stock_partner_delivery_window #1332

Closed

Conversation

heliaktiv
Copy link

No description provided.

grindtildeath and others added 25 commits July 20, 2023 15:00
Two small improvements:

* add a hook to change the delivery time format
* no need to display seconds, hh:mm is enough
…ry_time_preference

The default value introduced by workdays feature breaks the installation
of Demo databases as the change is not reflected in sale_partner_delivery_window.
version conflict prevents upload to pypi
When copying partner, if the partner's delivery time preference is time
window, time window ids should be copied as well.
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot migration stock_partner_delivery_window

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 16.0 milestone Jul 28, 2023
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2023
67 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@nguyenminhchien nguyenminhchien left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Functional test: ok
  • pre-commit check: need to make it pass

def _get_delivery_time_format_string(self):
return _("From %s to %s")

def get_delivery_time_description(self):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@heliaktiv find no place call this method (get_delivery_time_description)

@nguyenminhchien
Copy link
Contributor

Because there's no feedback from the author for a long time, i created a new PR #1378 to replace this one.

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

rousseldenis commented Sep 20, 2023

@heliaktiv Do you agree if we switch to #1378 ?

@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor

simahawk commented Oct 6, 2023

@heliaktiv ping

@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor

simahawk commented Oct 9, 2023

Enough inactivity here and we've got a completed work with reviews on #1378

@simahawk simahawk closed this Oct 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.