Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[15.0][MIG] stock_picking_whole_scrap: Migration to 15.0 #1008

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 30, 2022

Conversation

CarlosRoca13
Copy link
Contributor

@CarlosRoca13 CarlosRoca13 force-pushed the 15.0-MIG-stock_picking_whole_scrap branch from acef11f to 47a2112 Compare May 26, 2022 11:35
@sergio-teruel
Copy link
Contributor

sergio-teruel commented May 29, 2022

@CarlosRoca13 Can you review that runs with packages, please??

@CarlosRoca13 CarlosRoca13 force-pushed the 15.0-MIG-stock_picking_whole_scrap branch from 47a2112 to b9645b9 Compare May 30, 2022 06:50
@CarlosRoca13
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now, it should be working with them, thanks 4 the review

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

/ocabot migration stock_picking_whole_scrap
/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 15.0 milestone May 30, 2022
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 15.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1008-by-pedrobaeza-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot mentioned this pull request May 30, 2022
66 tasks
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 4a2a15b into OCA:15.0 May 30, 2022
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 657a84f. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

@CarlosRoca13 @carlosdauden @sergio-teruel @pedrobaeza Could you please pay attention to tests class when migrating to 15.0 ? Thanks. This will be fixed there #1020

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza deleted the 15.0-MIG-stock_picking_whole_scrap branch September 1, 2022 13:30
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

The deprecated warning is not something blocking, so although I agree it's advisable to change it, it's not mandatory.

sergio-teruel pushed a commit to Tecnativa/stock-logistics-workflow that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2023
Signed-off-by pedrobaeza
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants