Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[11.0][mrp_multi_level] enable MRP view in product templates #297

Merged

Conversation

JordiBForgeFlow
Copy link
Member

Adds the MRP fields to product template.

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow force-pushed the 11.0-mrp_multi_level-product-template branch 4 times, most recently from 274334a to 95a6fde Compare August 30, 2018 11:18
@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

Use this PR to do some fixes:

  • start to consider mrp_qty_multiple.
  • consider maximum order qty on the reordering wizard.
  • add roadmap to the readme. Nbr. Days field is not implemented.

@JordiBForgeFlow
Copy link
Member Author

@lreficent can you squash the commits? We are ready to merge thos one

JordiBForgeFlow and others added 4 commits October 30, 2018 10:54
* during bom explosion consider only stockable products in the BOM.
* add logo
* add rounding on application of stock demand estimates.
@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow force-pushed the 11.0-mrp_multi_level-product-template branch from 4e05f19 to 7d210ca Compare October 30, 2018 09:56
Copy link
Contributor

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If CI is green

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow added this to the 11.0 milestone Oct 30, 2018
@JordiBForgeFlow JordiBForgeFlow merged commit 529ecc8 into OCA:11.0 Oct 30, 2018
@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow deleted the 11.0-mrp_multi_level-product-template branch October 30, 2018 12:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants