cpio: 2.13 -> 2.14

[eliasnaur]

Description of changes

Changelog: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/cpio.git/tree/NEWS

Personally, I'm interested in the hard link fix to --reproducible.

Question for reviewers: is the cygwin patch,

  preConfigure = lib.optionalString stdenv.isCygwin ''
    sed -i gnu/fpending.h -e 's,include <stdio_ext.h>,,'
  '';

still necessary? I don't see a gnu/fpending.h file in the tarball.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[LeSuisse]

Question for reviewers: is the cygwin patch,

  preConfigure = lib.optionalString stdenv.isCygwin ''
    sed -i gnu/fpending.h -e 's,include <stdio_ext.h>,,'
  '';

still necessary? I don't see a gnu/fpending.h file in the tarball.

Are you sure? I'm seeing the file and patched content is present in the file in the tarball.

[eliasnaur]

Question for reviewers: is the cygwin patch,

  preConfigure = lib.optionalString stdenv.isCygwin ''
    sed -i gnu/fpending.h -e 's,include <stdio_ext.h>,,'
  '';

still necessary? I don't see a gnu/fpending.h file in the tarball.

Are you sure? I'm seeing the file and patched content is present in the file in the tarball.

You're right, I was looking in the source tarball, not the release tarball.

[risicle]

Built rpm on nixos x86_64, git.tests.withInstallCheck on macos 10.15 & nixos x86_64. Built pkgsStatic variant, pkgsMusl variant, pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform variant. Builds on aarch64-linux.