Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qt5.qtwebengine: use python3 (to fix cross) #220318

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

qt5.qtwebengine: use python3 (to fix cross) #220318

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Mar 9, 2023

The expression in its current form attempts to invoke the python2 interpreter for the wrong (i.e. build) architecture.

Using python3 explicitly, rather than relying on aliases, fixes this.

The expression in its current form attempts to invoke the python2
interpreter for the wrong (i.e. build) architecture.

Using python3 explicitly, rather than relying on aliases, fixes this.
@ghost ghost mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2023
@ofborg ofborg bot added 6.topic: cross-compilation Building packages on a different platform than they will be used on 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 0 labels Mar 9, 2023
@superherointj
Copy link
Contributor

superherointj commented Mar 9, 2023

PR isn't building as it is. Likely depends on #220310 ? But haven't tested [to claim certainty].

@amjoseph-nixpkgs would be ideal if description had the correct order of PRs to evaluate for related changes.

@Artturin
Copy link
Member

Artturin commented Mar 9, 2023

its not python2, the problem is that python3 isn't from __splicedPackages. fix in #220374

@Artturin Artturin closed this Mar 9, 2023
@ghost ghost deleted the pr/qt5/cross/qtwebengine-use-python3 branch March 9, 2023 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: cross-compilation Building packages on a different platform than they will be used on 6.topic: qt/kde 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants