Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TOF interfile and scanner fixes #66

Conversation

KrisThielemans
Copy link
Collaborator

  • changed "Timing resolution (ps)" keyword to "TOF timing resolution (ps)" (adding previous as an alias)
  • better checks and nicer formatting
  • removed some test scanners

@KrisThielemans KrisThielemans force-pushed the TOF_Interfile_scanner_fixes branch from 82d22bd to dbf6a21 Compare January 5, 2024 08:13
@KrisThielemans KrisThielemans force-pushed the TOF_Interfile_scanner_fixes branch from 3931deb to d7330dc Compare January 5, 2024 09:30
@KrisThielemans
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This should be fine now. Unfortunately, changing the DSTE template to span 2 (it was "0") seems to have uncovered a bug in the scatter estimation, nothing to do with TOF.

Initial investigation shows that

  • scatter simulation and upsampling is the same
  • reconstructed images during scatter estimation look fine but have different scale (and both seem to be wrong)

estimated (left) and simulated (right) scatter and diff (bottom):
image

@KrisThielemans
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I checked that this happens on master as well, see UCL#1302.

As this is independent of this PR, I will revert the change to go back to span=0, rd2 such that we can merge.

@KrisThielemans KrisThielemans merged commit 0e11a8f into NikEfth:tof_sino_UCL Jan 5, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@KrisThielemans KrisThielemans deleted the TOF_Interfile_scanner_fixes branch January 5, 2024 17:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant