Fix invalid block on mainnet #4695
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
LukaszRozmej
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rubo this needs investigation what is wrong with the package
Andrew-Pohl
pushed a commit
to fuseio/nethermind
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2022
* Fix invalid block on mainnet * Add submodule
rubo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 10, 2022
rubo
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2022
* Fix invalid block on mainnet * Add submodule
rubo
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rollback a package config.
Changes:
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce?
Put an
xin the boxes that applyTesting
Requires testing
In case you checked yes, did you write tests??
Comments about testing , should you have some (optional)
Seems to work... locally at least.
Further comments (optional)
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...