Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a rebatch call to RemoteObservable connections between stages. #744

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

crioux-stripe
Copy link
Collaborator

@crioux-stripe crioux-stripe commented Jan 10, 2025

Context

Adds a similar change to 721 to the connections in RemoteObservable. We're experiencing a lot more stage to stage dropping on the ARM machines with 15Gbit we're using at Stripe. The user needs to set workerClient.buffer.size to take advantage of this.

Checklist

  • ./gradlew build compiles code correctly
  • Added new tests where applicable
  • ./gradlew test passes all tests
  • Extended README or added javadocs where applicable

@crioux-stripe crioux-stripe had a problem deploying to Integrate Pull Request January 10, 2025 16:56 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@crioux-stripe crioux-stripe had a problem deploying to Integrate Pull Request January 10, 2025 17:04 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@crioux-stripe crioux-stripe marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2025 17:06
@crioux-stripe crioux-stripe had a problem deploying to Integrate Pull Request January 10, 2025 17:06 — with GitHub Actions Failure
Copy link

Test Results

620 tests  ±0   610 ✅ +1   7m 47s ⏱️ +2s
142 suites ±0    10 💤 ±0 
142 files   ±0     0 ❌  - 1 

Results for commit 263a0d4. ± Comparison against base commit 9ddcd1b.

@crioux-stripe crioux-stripe merged commit 292c419 into master Jan 10, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@crioux-stripe crioux-stripe deleted the crioux-stripe/add-rebatch-remote-observable branch January 10, 2025 20:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants