This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 13, 2023. It is now read-only.
Add property for the timeout of sweeper polling for workflows #3633
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request type
./gradlew generateLock saveLockto refresh dependencies)NOTE: Please remember to run
./gradlew spotlessApplyto fix any format violations.Changes in this PR
Adds a new property to configure the timeout that the sweeper thread will poll for workflows to sweep.
It was hard coded as 2000 ms, which for certain environments can lead to an increase in the overall duration of a workflow execution, as seen with @marosmars.
This is especially relevant for environments with low amounts of workflows executing at a given time, coupled with moderate to high CPU count, and in workflows with several SUB_WORKFLOW tasks.
Issue #
Alternatives considered
Describe alternative implementation you have considered