-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MSP430 and MSP430X fixes #6785
Open
Sleigh-InSPECtor
wants to merge
32
commits into
NationalSecurityAgency:master
Choose a base branch
from
Sleigh-InSPECtor:msp430_fixes
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
MSP430 and MSP430X fixes #6785
Sleigh-InSPECtor
wants to merge
32
commits into
NationalSecurityAgency:master
from
Sleigh-InSPECtor:msp430_fixes
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tes for 'X' suffix instructions
ryanmkurtz
added
Status: Triage
Information is being gathered
Feature: Processor/TI_MSP430
labels
Aug 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As part of a research project testing the accuracy of the SLEIGH specifications compared to real hardware, we observed unexpected behavior in a number of MSP430 and MSP430X instructions. As the fixes for these instructions where difficult to fully separate from each other this has been submitted as one pull request with each commit fixing a single issue. Where not mentioned the commit does not affect de-compilation to the best of our knowledge. The hardware compared to was an MSP430FR5969 and the documentation used was slau367p. TI's Code Composer Studios (CCS) was also used as a source of truth. To assist in checking these each heading links to the relevant commit.
Fix ADDA/SUBA/CMPA with CG registers
This commit adds support to the address instructions for using immediate from the constant generator and status register. The normal use of this is described in section 4.3.4. We have found that TI has added custom behavior to the normal addressing modes for the SR and CG to use these immediates. The behavior of these has been verified with hardware and the decompiler window of CCS.
Fix carry flag for SUBA
The carry flag for subtraction in msp430 should be set if there is not a borrow. This is opposite to what the documentation says for the
SUBA
instructions 4.6.4.10, but was found to be what the hardware does. It is also the same as the current behavior in sleigh for theSUB
instruction. Currently theSUBA
instruction does the opposite of this.Fix issue with index address when base register is in low memory
When MSP430 instructions use the indexed addressing mode they should behave differently depending on if the base register is located in the upper or lower 64KB of memory. This is described in section 4.4.2. Currently when MSP430 instructions use the indexing mode with the base register in the lower 64KB of memory they do not mask the final address to the lower 64KB of memory.
It looks like
ctx_isHi
was meant to handle this, but as the value in the base register isn't known during disassembly and varies during execution, this cant be used.This does show up in de-compilation.
Fix upper register zeroing for single operand instructions
Single operand MSP430 word instructions should clear the upper 16-19 bits for MSP430X, this is described in 4.3.5. Double operand word instructions as well as single and double operand byte instructions current clear the upper bits, but single operand word instructions has been missed.
Use correct size for jump offset for CPUX mode
For MSP430X, the MSP430JMP
instruction should have the immediate sign extended to 20 bits and then added to the 20 bit PC as described in 4.5.1.3. Currently it is fixed to the MSP430 width of 16 bits.This is incorrect as Ghidra seems to use the address and ignores the size restriction. This commit has no impact.
Fix handling of addressing modes that involve 20-bit immediates for 'X' suffix instructions
MSP430X instructions which use the extended instruction word encode the upper 4 bits of the immediate in the source field of the non-register mode extension word. This is described in section 4.5.2.2. Currently these bits are ignored for the immediate, label, and indexed address modes for these instructions.
Add handling for the RRUX instruction
The current note about the
RRUX
instruction is partially correct. CCS does replaceRRUX.W
andRRUX.A
withRRUM.W #1, ..
andRRUM.A #1, ..
as it is a 1 word instead of a 2 word instruction. But it is incorrect forRRUX.B
which it inserts aRRUX.B
instructions for. The encoding forRRUX
instructions is theRRCX
instruction with the zero carry bit set, but is considered by the manual as its own instruction (4.5.2.4).Reset overflow bit in RRCX
The
RRCX
instruction should reset the overflow bit (4.6.3.28), currently it does not.Even align PC
The program counter should always have the least significant bit set to 0 (4.3.1). Currently there are some instructions which can write odd values to this registers. This fix could affect de-compilation of some of the MSP430X instructions which did not have masks already, as existing masks already show in de-compilation.
The
postIncrementStore
constructor is currently very repetitive and can be simplified. Thectx_al=1
condition for the address size is also the wrong way around, this prevents MSP430X instructions which use this table and write to the PC from jumping to above 64KB in memory. It also includes a redundant zero extend (zeroExtend
) only for byte instructions.Use signed immediate in symbolic mode
The symbolic addressing mode should add the signed immediate to the program counter (4.4.3). Currently it adds the unsigned immediate.
Word align word and address memory accesses
We have found that the hardware ignores the lower bit of word and address memory accesses to forcefully align them to 16 bits. While this is not mentioned in the documentation it has been mentioned as the correct behavior on TI's support forum Accessing unaligned memory.
Stop POPM from writing to SP and CG
POPM currently writes values to the stack pointer and constant generator when restoring registers from the stack. From testing with hardware we have found that the value in memory which is meant to be restored to the stack pointer is ignored. This value is meant to be the current SP value which is likely why this is the case. It is also incorrect to write any value to the constant generator register as it does not exist as a register.
ctx_al should default to 1
The
ctx_al
context field represents the A/L bit of the extension word. This bit is set to 1 for byte and word instructions and 0 for address instructions. To allowpostRegIncrement
and other constructors shared between the MSP430 and MSP430X instructions to work this field should default to 1.Replaced dest_0_4 with new DST20_0_4
This commit replaces most occurrences of the
dest_0_4
reg in the MSP430X.sinc file with a new constructorDEST20_0_4
. This constructor sets the value of the PC to the start of the next instruction before exporting it. Currently the PC holds the address of the start of the current instruction which causes register accesses to read the wrong value.Signed 20 bit values are not properly handled
As sleigh only supports byte sized registers, 20 bit values are stored in a larger register, minimum 3 bytes. Due to this signed operations like
s<
,s>>
, andsext()
do not work as the 20th bit is never the sign bit.Mask address register accesses to 20 bits
MSP430X registers should hold at most 20 bits as that is the register width. Some instructions which read a value from memory or sign extend a smaller value to the full width allow writing larger values. These mask appear in de-compilation.
Added temporary for src in adda and suba macro
When the source and destination registers are the same the source get overwritten when writing the destination. This then produces wrong values for the flags.
POP.W POP.B need to delay building the destination reg
We have found that the
POP
instruction first reads the value from the stack, increments the stack pointer, and then moves the value found to the current destination. This is different to the current behavior of thePOP
instruction which first builds the destination. This fixes cases such asPOP 0x0(SP)
as they now write to memory at the address of the SP after incrementing.MOV, MOVX, MOVA, and BRA @rn+ do not correctly order opperations
This is similar to the above fix as
POP
is an emulated instruction, thereforePOP 0x0(SP)
is actuallyMOV @SP+,0x0(SP)
.BRA
is also an emulated instruction makingBRA @rn+
reallyMOVA @rn+, PC
. We have found that in generalMOV
instructions fetch the source, auto-increment, fetch the destination, and move what the source value was to the destination.Fixed ordering of SP decrementing for CALLA
We have found that for
CALLA SP
instructions the initial value of the stack pointer is used as the jump destination. The current behavior of this instructions is to jump to the value of the stack pointer minus 4.POPX fixes
The
POPX
instructions currently does not jump when the PC is used as the destination register.POPX
also had the same ordering issues fixed previously with thePOP
instructions.Check correct sign bit for RRAM.W and RLAM.W
Currently the
RRAM.W
andRLAM.W
instructions check the 20th bit for the sign value. This is incorrect as they are word instructions and clear the upper bits.SXT sign extend through 20 bits
For MSP430X, the MSP430
SXT
instruction should sign extend through the full register (4.3.5). Currently it only sign extends up to a word.Add address support to postRegIncrement
Currently the
postRegIncrement
table doesn't handle 20 bit sizes, but is used in single operand address sized instructions. This causes instructions which access address sized memory with the indirect auto-increment addressing mode (4.4) to increment by 1 instead of 4. It also causes jumps from using the PC as the destination register to be masked to a byte.Fix ordering for PUSHX instructions
The correct ordering for a push instruction is to fetch the source value, decrement the SP, and write the value to the memory at that location. Figure 4-8 shows he result after a
PUSH SP
instruction. Currently thePUSHX
instruction does not do this and instead writes the value of the new SP to the memory the SP addresses.RRCX.A uses wrong value for address mask
In the
RRCX.A
instruction the register is shifted to the right one, and then the upper 19 bits should be masked for the main result. Currently the value0x0xEFFFF
is used as the mask instead of0x7FFFF
.SXTX, RRAX, and RRCX overlaps for rpt
Currently the
SXTX
,RRAX
, andRRCX
instructions overlap as the 7th bit is not checked in the disassembly. TheRRAX
andRRCX
instructions use the extended single-operand format shown in figure 4-31.Address instructions use wrong value for pc with indexed mode
We found that when using the program counter as the base register for the indexed accessing mode for address instructions, the address of the start of the immediate field should be used. As the address instructions take up 2 bytes this is the instruction start + 2.
Add postStorePC to rpt RLAX instructions
The non-register repeat variant of the
RLAX
instructions should jump when changing the program counter, currently they do not.rpt must use register addressing mode
The repeat instructions are only valid when using the register addressing mode. This is shown in 4.5.2. Currently other addressing modes are allow and where possible Ghidra will prefer the repeat format over the regular instruction.
PUSHM SP and PC fixes
We found that the
PUSHM
instructions push the address of the next instruction when pushing the program counter, currently it is pushing the start address of the current instructions. ThePUSHM
instructions where also found to push the value of the stack pointer before decrementing instead of the value after as is currently done.Use postStorePC for address instructions instead of duplicating
By using the
postStorePC
constructor, special cases of the address instructions with the PC as the destination can be removed. This commit does not fix any behavioural issues.