Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "pin cdifflib version (#593)" #599

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

pstjohn
Copy link
Collaborator

@pstjohn pstjohn commented Jan 14, 2025

This reverts commit 2e90bf5.

Description

We don't need this anymore (assuming tests pass with the new version) thanks to quick action here: mduggan/cdifflib#13

Type of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Refactor
  • Documentation update
  • Other (please describe):

CI Pipeline Configuration

Configure CI behavior by checking relevant boxes below. This will automatically apply labels.

Note

By default, the notebooks validation tests are skipped unless explicitly enabled.

Usage

TODO: Add code snippet

Pre-submit Checklist

  • I have tested these changes locally
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added/updated tests as needed
  • All existing tests pass successfully

This reverts commit 2e90bf5.

Signed-off-by: Peter St. John <pstjohn@nvidia.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.78%. Comparing base (4edeb0a) to head (c50a3d1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #599   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.78%   88.78%           
=======================================
  Files          81       81           
  Lines        5027     5027           
=======================================
  Hits         4463     4463           
  Misses        564      564           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pstjohn pstjohn enabled auto-merge (squash) January 14, 2025 17:17
@pstjohn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pstjohn commented Jan 14, 2025

/build-ci

1 similar comment
@pstjohn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pstjohn commented Jan 14, 2025

/build-ci

@pstjohn pstjohn merged commit 2438115 into NVIDIA:main Jan 14, 2025
9 checks passed
sichu2023 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
This reverts commit 2e90bf5.

### Description
We don't need this anymore (assuming tests pass with the new version)
thanks to quick action here: mduggan/cdifflib#13

### Type of changes
<!-- Mark the relevant option with an [x] -->

- [ ]  Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ]  New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ]  Refactor
- [ ]  Documentation update
- [ ]  Other (please describe):

### CI Pipeline Configuration
Configure CI behavior by checking relevant boxes below. This will
automatically apply labels.

- [ ]
[SKIP_CI](https://github.com/NVIDIA/bionemo-framework/blob/main/docs/docs/user-guide/contributing/contributing.md#skip_ci)
- Skip all continuous integration tests
- [ ]
[INCLUDE_NOTEBOOKS_TESTS](https://github.com/NVIDIA/bionemo-framework/blob/main/docs/docs/user-guide/contributing/contributing.md#include_notebooks_tests)
- Execute notebook validation tests in pytest

> [!NOTE]
> By default, the notebooks validation tests are skipped unless
explicitly enabled.

### Usage
<!--- How does a user interact with the changed code -->
```python
TODO: Add code snippet
```

### Pre-submit Checklist
<!--- Ensure all items are completed before submitting -->

 - [ ] I have tested these changes locally
 - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly
 - [ ] I have added/updated tests as needed
 - [ ] All existing tests pass successfully

Signed-off-by: Peter St. John <pstjohn@nvidia.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants