Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove unused file from repo #562

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

jwilber
Copy link
Collaborator

@jwilber jwilber commented Dec 31, 2024

Removing an unused file, docs.todo, from the repo.

@jwilber jwilber added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation SKIP_CI Completely skips the CI pipeline labels Dec 31, 2024
@jwilber jwilber self-assigned this Dec 31, 2024
Signed-off-by: Jared Wilber <jwilber@nvidia.com>
@jwilber jwilber force-pushed the jwilber/remove-unused-todo-file branch from df76cd7 to 41be7b2 Compare January 2, 2025 17:50
@jwilber
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jwilber commented Jan 6, 2025

/build-ci

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the SKIP_CI Completely skips the CI pipeline label Jan 6, 2025
@jwilber
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jwilber commented Jan 6, 2025

/build-ci

@jwilber jwilber enabled auto-merge (squash) January 6, 2025 20:55
@jwilber jwilber added the SKIP_CI Completely skips the CI pipeline label Jan 6, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the SKIP_CI Completely skips the CI pipeline label Jan 6, 2025
@jwilber jwilber added the SKIP_CI Completely skips the CI pipeline label Jan 7, 2025
@jwilber
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jwilber commented Jan 7, 2025

/build-ci

@jwilber jwilber merged commit dca314e into main Jan 7, 2025
6 checks passed
@jwilber jwilber deleted the jwilber/remove-unused-todo-file branch January 7, 2025 05:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation SKIP_CI Completely skips the CI pipeline
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants