added protection against bad batch inputs with test

[grantbuster]

No description provided.

[ppinchuk]

Thanks for doing that. Anything we can do to make batch more user-friendly is a win TBH.

The linter is going to complain a bit but feel free to ignore it and merge anyways. NVM, we're good!

[grantbuster]

Thanks for doing that. Anything we can do to make batch more user-friendly is a win TBH.

The linter is going to complain a bit but feel free to ignore it and merge anyways. NVM, we're good!

Psh yeah my code style is CLEAN!

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 69.23% and project coverage change: -0.15% ⚠️

Comparison is base (6e9092d) 98.24% compared to head (3e74d86) 98.10%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #19      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.24%   98.10%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          26       26              
  Lines        2674     2685      +11     
  Branches      447      450       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2627     2634       +7     
- Misses         32       35       +3     
- Partials       15       16       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	98.10% <69.23%> (-0.15%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
gaps/cli/documentation.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
gaps/batch.py	98.28% <69.23%> (-1.72%)	⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.