Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix CppCheck Build #10792

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024
Merged

Fix CppCheck Build #10792

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

Myoldmopar
Copy link
Member

Pull request overview

CppCheck is suddenly not building on our GHA tests. It looks like GitHub just pushed ubuntu-latest from 22.04 to 24.04. I confirmed that locally on 24.04 I also get a build failure with CppCheck 2.10. I could have fallen back to ubuntu-22.04 for our GHA builds, but I decided to instead just update our CppCheck version. I can build 2.15.0 fine locally, so I pointed our GHA tests to that latest version. If this is green and CppCheck is producing good results, this should be good to go.

NOTE: ENHANCEMENTS MUST FOLLOW A SUBMISSION PROCESS INCLUDING A FEATURE PROPOSAL AND DESIGN DOCUMENT PRIOR TO SUBMITTING CODE

Pull Request Author

Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.

  • Title of PR should be user-synopsis style (clearly understandable in a standalone changelog context)
  • Label the PR with at least one of: Defect, Refactoring, NewFeature, Performance, and/or DoNoPublish
  • Pull requests that impact EnergyPlus code must also include unit tests to cover enhancement or defect repair
  • Author should provide a "walkthrough" of relevant code changes using a GitHub code review comment process
  • If any diffs are expected, author must demonstrate they are justified using plots and descriptions
  • If changes fix a defect, the fix should be demonstrated in plots and descriptions
  • If any defect files are updated to a more recent version, upload new versions here or on DevSupport
  • If IDD requires transition, transition source, rules, ExpandObjects, and IDFs must be updated, and add IDDChange label
  • If structural output changes, add to output rules file and add OutputChange label
  • If adding/removing any LaTeX docs or figures, update that document's CMakeLists file dependencies

Reviewer

This will not be exhaustively relevant to every PR.

  • Perform a Code Review on GitHub
  • If branch is behind develop, merge develop and build locally to check for side effects of the merge
  • If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
  • If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
  • CI status: all green or justified
  • Check that performance is not impacted (CI Linux results include performance check)
  • Run Unit Test(s) locally
  • Check any new function arguments for performance impacts
  • Verify IDF naming conventions and styles, memos and notes and defaults
  • If new idf included, locally check the err file and other outputs

@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar added the DoNotPublish Includes changes that shouldn't be reported in the changelog label Oct 15, 2024
@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar self-assigned this Oct 15, 2024
@Myoldmopar
Copy link
Member Author

OK, CppCheck is now working happily again. I'm able to use the Ubuntu 24 cppcheck version so we don't have to manually build it anymore. I disabled the folder caching, but it still ran in just 10ish minutes from scratch. I almost went down the rabbit hole of cleaning up all our cppcheck arguments, but held off. For now. This can merge to get cppcheck working again on everyone's commits.

@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar merged commit df85d41 into develop Oct 15, 2024
@Myoldmopar Myoldmopar deleted the FixCppCheckBuild branch October 15, 2024 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DoNotPublish Includes changes that shouldn't be reported in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant