Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2TM-MDEF with phonon coupling #73

Open
reinimaurer1 opened this issue Jun 22, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

2TM-MDEF with phonon coupling #73

reinimaurer1 opened this issue Jun 22, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@reinimaurer1
Copy link
Member

Here a proposal for a feature enhancement:

My understanding is that @oadoug and @jamesgardner1421 have already implemented a 2TM-MDEF dynamics approach, so given a T_el(t) profile, MDEF dynamics can be performed where the temperature of the electronic bath is coupled to the 2TM temperature profile. This takes a precalculated T_el profile.

It would be interesting to extend this approach to also couple to the T_phonon profile to the MD that is calculated in the 2 temperature model. See approaches by Peter Saalfrank and Maite Alducin:
https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125439

The way how this works is that the atoms of the surface are coupled to a standard thermostat (Nose or Langevin or whatever) and the temperature of that thermostat is coupled to the time-dependent T_phonon profile from the 2TM calculation.

Side note:
@oadoug mentioned at some point that he was interested to port his (currently Python-based) 2TM equation implementation to JL. When using precalculated T_el profiles, that isn't really a high priority right now, but it could be interesting if, in the future, we might be interested to look into some self-consistent approach where the atomistic dynamics are propagated simultaneously with the 2TM and they interact with each other.

@reinimaurer1 reinimaurer1 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 22, 2021
@jamesgardner1421
Copy link
Member

In the linked paper the surface is frozen, do they do this approach in a different paper? Or is this something new?

From what I understand you are suggesting having two thermostats:

  1. Electronic friction thermostat connected to adsorbate atoms. This takes temperature from T_el profile and friction coefficient from ab-initio/LDFA.
  2. Phonon thermostat connected to slab atoms. Takes temperature from T_phonon profile and the friction coefficient would be a parameter (in the Langevin case).

Is this correct?

@reinimaurer1
Copy link
Member Author

You got it, that is exactly what is suggested.

sorry, this paper is more relevant:
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.246802

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants