Add ability to compress ocean and ice products

[EricSinsky-NOAA]

Description

This PR adds the ability to optionally compress ocean and ice products for the GEFS reforecast. Compression can be set using a new config.base variable called DO_OCNICE_COMPRESS. For the reforecast, the ice history data and the 0p25 ocean post-processed data are gzipped at the end of the ice and ocean prod tasks, respectively. The archive task was also modified to allow either gzipped or non-gzipped ocean and ice data to be sent to HPSS, which is controlled by DO_OCNICE_COMPRESS.

Furthermore, an option was added to skip the ocean and ice post-processing within the ocean and ice prod jobs, respectively. This can be controlled by DO_ICE_INTERP and DO_OCN_INTERP in config.base. In order to meet the reforecast requirements, DO_ICE_INTERP is set to NO and and DO_OCN_INTERP is set to YES by default.

This PR also accomplishes the following:

• The default WCOSS2 STMP and PTMP were modified to /lfs/h3/emc/gefstemp/ because this is the space where the reforecast will be performed.
• The wavepostpnt task has been removed.
• If a group account is used, divide the stmp and ptmp directories by SUDO_USER.
• The clean_up job has been modified for the reforecast.

Type of change

• Bug fix (fixes something broken)
• New feature (adds functionality)
• Maintenance (code refactor, clean-up, new CI test, etc.)

Change characteristics

• Is this a breaking change (a change in existing functionality)? NO
• Does this change require a documentation update? NO
• Does this change require an update to any of the following submodules? NO (If YES, please add a link to any PRs that are pending.)
  • EMC verif-global
  • GDAS
  • GFS-utils
  • GSI
  • GSI-monitor
  • GSI-utils
  • UFS-utils
  • UFS-weather-model
  • wxflow

How has this been tested?

The GEFS replay configuration was tested on WCOSS2.

Checklist

• Any dependent changes have been merged and published
• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have documented my code, including function, input, and output descriptions
• My changes generate no new warnings
• New and existing tests pass with my changes
• This change is covered by an existing CI test or a new one has been added
• Any new scripts have been added to the .github/CODEOWNERS file with owners
• I have made corresponding changes to the system documentation if necessary