-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 562
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update dev/ufs-weather-model branch with develop - 2023-jun-27 #1029
Update dev/ufs-weather-model branch with develop - 2023-jun-27 #1029
Conversation
…ling frequency to check if 'receive' coupling exchanges need to take place fail, resulting in an infinite loop causing the integration between time zero and the first time step to repeat indefinitely. This check needs to be rewritten, which fixes also issue NOAA-EMC#816 in a simpler way. (NOAA-EMC#999)
* origin/develop: handle NaN air-sea temperatures from nearest land points (NOAA-EMC#869) Increase valid_max for f in ounp (NOAA-EMC#1014) Bugfix deallocation of invalid memory in ww3_prnc (NOAA-EMC#1016) Update to orion intel module path and two typo corrections. (NOAA-EMC#1011) Bugfix to out of bounds array write in w3profsmd_pdlib.f90 (NOAA-EMC#1013) Simple logic fix for time interpolation of boundary nodes at the end of W3XYPFSNIMP. (NOAA-EMC#1005) in w3iors use NSEA instead of NSEAL in serial write/read of VA (NOAA-EMC#954) Update documentation for UNST namelist (NOAA-EMC#986) In certain coupled configurations, the piece of code testing the coupling frequency to check if 'receive' coupling exchanges need to take place fail, resulting in an infinite loop causing the integration between time zero and the first time step to repeat indefinitely. This check needs to be rewritten, which fixes also issue NOAA-EMC#816 in a simpler way. (NOAA-EMC#999)
fyi @JessicaMeixner-NOAA we just need to approve to get into the UFS queue. |
Thanks @JessicaMeixner-NOAA 👍 |
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA Can you please give a look over the commits after your approval and re-approve if all looks OK? |
@BrianCurtis-NOAA Thanks for your request of re-approval. Everything looks good here! |
Hello, testing is complete on UFS-WM PR #1811. @JessicaMeixner-NOAA can you please go ahead to merge this PR? |
Pull Request Summary
Syncs updates in
develop
branch todev/ufs-weather-model
branch.Description
Sync develop to dev/ufs-weather-model. No change of answers.
Please also include the following information:
Issue(s) addressed
Commit Message
Sync develop to dev/ufs-weather-model
Check list
Testing
Tested within UFS by running the full RT's. WW3 regression tests are not run for
dev/ufs-weather-model
. Test logs are attached to the ufs-weather-model PR, ufs-community/ufs-weather-model/pull/1811.