-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide bug fixes and add ALTKOB json file: marine monthly in situ BUFR #879
Conversation
unwanted file
@emilyhcliu, the 6-hrly dumps for 20210801 are on orion at: Let me know, if you can access it. It does have altkob bufr data as well. |
For booking purpose, here is the list of marine-related data types added to bufr2ioda processing:
|
Marin data processing were tested with the latest feature branch ( bugfix/monthly_marine_bufr2ioda) for The ROTDIR for the test on Orion: /work2/noaa/da/eliu/gdas-validation/comroot/gdas_eval_sevcsr_JEDI/gdas.20210801/00/obs Summary of test results:
2. Trackob_surface failed in python (see below)
3. The following three types received the following error message:
I updated the obs directory in ROTDIR with the bufr_d files from /work2/noaa/da/spaturi/forRuss/gdas.20210801/00/atmos, where all required marine data (total 8) exist. However, the bufr2ioda processing still looking for the global dump (/work/noaa/rstprod/dump/gdas.20210801/00) for input. The obs ROTDIR for the Investigating.... |
Added depth
@emilyhcliu, the |
To do the test correctly, I have created a temporary dump for 2021080100 The There are total 8 bufr2ioda processings for marine data: 6 Out of the 8 marine data processings, 6 of them completed successfully:
The following 2 data types failed:
Here are the error messages related to the failures:
tesac_mammals_profiles
|
Removed depth, stationID
@emilyhcliu, I removed the If it still is a problem, may I suggest you comment out or not to test |
@ShastriPaturi : Will this PR, #879, or #914 fix issue #907. It would be good to turn on JEDI DA ATM CI testing in g-w (issue #2294). Doing so requires that marine bufr2ioda converters to not fail when expected input bufr files are not present. |
@RussTreadon-NOAA yes. |
Great! This is good news @ShastriPaturi. When do you expect #879 and #914 to be merged into GDASApp |
@RussTreadon-NOAA I expect this to be done this week |
@ShastriPaturi , are you OK with merging PR #937 into |
@RussTreadon-NOAA , I'll speak for @ShastriPaturi and say yes, merge #937 before this PR. |
|
This PR does two things:
fixes #877