Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Capgen in scm #522

Draft
wants to merge 56 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Capgen in scm #522

wants to merge 56 commits into from

Conversation

dustinswales
Copy link
Collaborator

@dustinswales dustinswales commented Sep 26, 2024

Draft PR for CCPP SCM changes needed for transition to Capgen.
Work in progress

dustinswales and others added 30 commits January 2, 2024 14:39
…e as the module, which was causing problems in Capgen where flat-fields are passed from the API to the suite caps (e.g. the argument lsm_noah is now a problem in the lsm_noah module, when GFS_control%lsm_noah was not a conflict
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@dustinswales dustinswales Mar 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@climbfuji Here's the snippet that I added to the SDF which you could drop into the rest of them. Just if you agree, and to avoid a future conflict.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect, thanks!

<!-- End process-split section -->
<!-- Begin time-split section -->
<group name="physics_ts">
<subcycle loop="1">
<scheme>GFS_suite_stateout_update</scheme>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should the GFS_suite_stateout_update be part of the process_split group? Seems more logical to me that the process split group at the end updates the state from all the processes (this is also what the framework will do automatically in the future)?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that makes more sense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants