Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Check error handling/reporting for static build (ufs-weather-model, SCM) #239

Closed
climbfuji opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Check error handling/reporting for static build (ufs-weather-model, SCM) #239

climbfuji opened this issue Oct 31, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@climbfuji
Labels
work in progress

Comments

@climbfuji
Copy link
Collaborator

Users have reported that the actual error message coming from a physics scheme is not printed to screen, instead only "an error occurred in call to ccpp_physics_..." is returned. This may be an issue with the CCPP implementation in the respective model, or with the ccpp_prebuild framework itself.

How to test: in ufs-weather-model, use old ozone physics input file with new ozone physics activated or vice versa.
@climbfuji climbfuji self-assigned this Oct 31, 2019
@climbfuji
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is partially addressed in #240. For avoiding mismatches between the namelist options and suite definition file entries for ozone physics, see NCAR/ccpp-physics#350. The error reporting in gmtb-scm is fixed in NCAR/ccpp-scm#136. Not yet checked/addressed: ufs-weather-model

@climbfuji
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Needed for UFS release.

@climbfuji
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This has been fixed prior to the UFS MRW App release in 2020.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@climbfuji climbfuji

Labels
work in progress
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@climbfuji