Bugfix bandpass, address scipy.integrate.trapz deprecation, address astropy security vulnerability

[mkelley]

• scipy 1.6 renamed scipy.integrate.trapz to scipy.integrate.trapezoid, and scipy 1.14 has dropped scipy.integrate.trapz. Limit support to scipy>=1.6 (release Dec 2020) and use scipy.integrate.trapezoid.
• astropy<5.3.3 has a critical security vulnerability: require astropy >= 5.3.3
• Update min numpy version to match astropy 5.3
• synphot 1.4 deprecated the wave_unit keyword, which causes our tests to crash when reading in the SDSS filter transmission files: add TUNIT1="ANGSTROM" to the filter transmission FITS file headers and only use wave_unit when reading in the PanSTARRS filter transmission files.
• Testing with pyoorb and numpy=2 causes some tests to fail. I think this is due to a difference in the ABI versions. Limit continuous integration testing with pyoorb to numpy<2.

addresses #397

[pep8speaks]

Hello @mkelley! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

• In the file sbpy/calib/tests/test_sun.py:

Line 27:80: E501 line too long (87 > 79 characters)
Line 38:80: E501 line too long (88 > 79 characters)
Line 193:80: E501 line too long (81 > 79 characters)

Comment last updated at 2024-07-11 11:20:32 UTC

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.40%. Comparing base (1315915) to head (26819aa).
Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #400      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.52%   77.40%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          81       79       -2     
  Lines        7096     7060      -36     
==========================================
- Hits         5501     5465      -36     
  Misses       1595     1595              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mkelley]

I think the failed code coverage check can be ignored. I removed a lot of lines from the documentation that were for astropy < 5.3, so the total number of lines covered by the tests has gone down.

[hhsieh00]

Looks good to me