Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOTFIX] Put setProperty() in configure block #418

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2022

Conversation

pcrosemurgy
Copy link
Contributor

  • Tickets addressed: AERIE-None
  • Review: By commit
  • Merge strategy: Merge (no squash)

Description

This is an attempt to force Gradle to set this property when running gradle publish.

@pcrosemurgy pcrosemurgy marked this pull request as ready for review November 2, 2022 23:28
@pcrosemurgy pcrosemurgy requested a review from a team as a code owner November 2, 2022 23:28
This is an attempt to force Gradle to set this property when running
`gradle publish`.
@pcrosemurgy pcrosemurgy force-pushed the rosemurg-publishing-version-as-property branch from 4d7c0ad to 4a5b755 Compare November 2, 2022 23:33
@pcrosemurgy pcrosemurgy temporarily deployed to e2e-test November 2, 2022 23:33 Inactive
@pcrosemurgy pcrosemurgy changed the title Put setProperty() in configure block [HOTFIX] Put setProperty() in configure block Nov 2, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automatically approved due to detection of the following labels: hotfix

@camargo camargo merged commit 355f98d into develop Nov 2, 2022
@camargo camargo deleted the rosemurg-publishing-version-as-property branch November 2, 2022 23:45
@camargo camargo added the build Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies label Nov 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants