Make GetFeaturePatches virtual so you don't need to override it

[Nytra]

99% of the time this is left empty anyway

[Banane9]

Hmmm, maybe the whole feature thing needs to be reworked in general. It's a lot of definition work to set up and hard to make exhaustive.

Perhaps using the affected type (names) would work well enough. For anything using harmony patches that could be autogenerated anyways (analyzing the patch attributes or TargetMethod(s) method) , only for pre-patchers it could be trickier, though it could also be estimated based on the requested Assembly and Type definitions 🤔

[Nytra]

It could do that, although there would still need to be a way to determine what feature a given type is a part of

[Banane9]

there would still need to be a way to determine what feature a given type is a part of

I guess we could use the namespace / type names for that. At least overall that should be fine 🤔