Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GEOPY-1682: Add new data_type attributes #633

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MatthieuCMira
Copy link
Contributor

@MatthieuCMira MatthieuCMira commented Oct 8, 2024

GEOPY-1682 - Add new data_type attributes
add new attributes.

/!\ Duplicate Type on copy is already used as a class attribute

/!\ Duplicate Type on copy is already used as a class attribute
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title GEOPY-1682 GEOPY-1682: Add new data_type attributes Oct 8, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.71%. Comparing base (f598da6) to head (72825db).
Report is 4 commits behind head on release/0.10.0.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           release/0.10.0     #633      +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage           90.67%   90.71%   +0.04%     
==================================================
  Files                 104      104              
  Lines                8671     8712      +41     
  Branches             1772     1777       +5     
==================================================
+ Hits                 7862     7903      +41     
  Misses                434      434              
  Partials              375      375              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
geoh5py/data/data_type.py 95.20% <100.00%> (+0.78%) ⬆️

@domfournier domfournier merged commit 3a35129 into release/0.10.0 Oct 8, 2024
13 checks passed
@domfournier domfournier deleted the GEOPY-1682 branch October 8, 2024 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants