test: Removing test selector strings within app code

[cortisiko]

Description

We have instances where testIDs are not consistently stored in variables. This lack of uniformity can lead to redundant testID declarations throughout the codebase, resulting in code that is harder to maintain and prone to errors.

A more effective and best-practice approach is to store the testID value as a variable and then reference that variable when defining the testID property. By doing so, we centralize the testID values, reducing redundancy and making it easier to manage and maintain these identifiers throughout the codebase. This approach enhances code consistency and reduces the likelihood of introducing errors, ultimately contributing to a more robust and maintainable codebase.

Related issues

Fixes: #

Manual testing steps

1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Passing Smoke tests: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/370a245b-4b4a-4b60-846d-2f8954da58b2

Passing Regression tests: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/4c9a6f33-680f-49e4-bf4a-aae67865492c

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Coding Standards.
• I've clearly explained what problem this PR is solving and how it is solved.
• I've linked related issues
• I've included manual testing steps
• I've included screenshots/recordings if applicable
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.
• I’ve properly set the pull request status:
  • In case it's not yet "ready for review", I've set it to "draft".
  • In case it's "ready for review", I've changed it from "draft" to "non-draft".

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (bbe9eeb) 36.66% compared to head (21c4ab2) 36.66%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7967   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   36.66%   36.66%           
=======================================
  Files        1090     1090           
  Lines       29115    29115           
  Branches     2668     2668           
=======================================
  Hits        10674    10674           
  Misses      17835    17835           
  Partials      606      606           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

E2E test started on Bitrise: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/370a245b-4b4a-4b60-846d-2f8954da58b2
You can also kick off another Bitrise E2E smoke test by removing and re-applying the (Run Smoke E2E) label

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
1 Code Smell

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[chrisleewilcox]

LGTM