feat: Simulation re-trigger

[OGPoyraz]

Description

This PR aims to add re-simulation logic which recently added at MetaMask/core#4792

Patch note:
Transaction controller patch adds the re-simulate feature, branched belove to keep track - this will eventually be removed in subsequent releases.
MetaMask/core@main...patch/mobile-transaction-controller-35-0-0

Related issues

Fixes: https://github.com/MetaMask/MetaMask-planning/issues/3380

Manual testing steps

Since the changes are in the core - it's already validated in the extension in the transaction lifecycle.

But for the sake of risk, all transaction simulations will be rechecked and approval will be needed from QA as we discussed internally.

Screenshots/Recordings

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.13.Pro.-.2024-10-29.at.14.15.02.mp4

Before

NA

After

NA

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 64.00000% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (release/7.33.1@0302b52). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...p/components/Views/confirmations/Approval/index.js	10.00%	9 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             release/7.33.1   #12073   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?   53.99%           
=================================================
  Files                     ?     1647           
  Lines                     ?    38337           
  Branches                  ?     4672           
=================================================
  Hits                      ?    20699           
  Misses                    ?    16208           
  Partials                  ?     1430           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
33.3% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 60%)
18.2% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 10%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[sethkfman]

Considering the manual test evidence. I am okay moving forward with an override. I would like to see an issue created to support modal unit testing for these scenarios. @OGPoyraz

[sleepytanya]

Bitrise builds:

https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/4469c953-368c-49aa-b322-850019994581?tab=workflows

https://app.bitrise.io/build/4a80f97e-7cee-49ba-b0c0-d3b0e150ce5c?tab=log

The fix has been implemented successfully. However, we experienced a challenge with the iOS build on Bitrise, which prevented testing the functionality on a physical device. Despite this, the local iOS build operates as anticipated.

Screen_Recording_20241029_113830_MetaMask.mp4

last.mp4

In iOS Bitrise build all transaction action are disabled and other errors not related to the current PR are present as well, for example the error you get when trying to access networks modal: