chore: upgrade assets-controllers to v35.0.0

[sahar-fehri]

Description

Upgrade assets-controllers v35.0.0

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

after.mov

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 96d22da
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/c758154a-3bac-4191-ad6a-b101af95fb09

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[socket-security]

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package	New capabilities	Transitives	Size	Publisher
npm/@metamask/assets-controllers@35.0.0	None	+4	2.54 MB	metamaskbot
npm/@metamask/polling-controller@9.0.1	None	0	138 kB	metamaskbot

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@metamask/assets-controllers@34.0.0

View full report↗︎

[gambinish]

LGTM

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 7cf108f
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/7937e90c-bb55-4aba-a404-209002994681

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.65%. Comparing base (5e5190f) to head (7cf108f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #11903   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.65%   54.65%           
=======================================
  Files        1744     1744           
  Lines       39333    39333           
  Branches     4878     4878           
=======================================
  Hits        21497    21497           
  Misses      16340    16340           
  Partials     1496     1496           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: d9e7b13
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/96a72dc5-d690-4138-b18e-468fab33c131

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: f678d86
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/cf039bbe-6c18-4040-8e40-485668756c88

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud