feat: STAKE-805 integrate stake method

[Matt561]

Description

This PR enables staking on both Ethereum mainnet and Holesky.

Related issues

Ticket: STAKE-805: [FE] [Stake flow] Integrate stake sdk method

Manual testing steps

1. Add export MM_POOLED_STAKING_UI_ENABLED=true to your .js.env file.
2. Select Ethereum in the asset list
3. Scroll down a bit and click "Stake More"
4. Enter an amount to stake and click "review"
5. On the review screen, click "Continue"
6. You should see the transaction confirmation screen appear. Click "Confirm".
7. The transaction should be submitted and you should be redirected to the Ethereum asset details page

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

stake-824-build-stake-confirmation-screen-after.mov

After

Update: On transaction submission, the user is now redirected to the Transactions View.

stake-805-stake-method-demo-after.mov

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[socket-security]

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package	New capabilities	Transitives	Size	Publisher
npm/@metamask/stake-sdk@0.2.13	network	0	165 kB	metamaskbot

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@metamask/stake-sdk@0.2.11

View full report↗︎

[socket-security]

👍 Dependency issues cleared. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

This PR previously contained dependency changes with security issues that have been resolved, removed, or ignored.

Ignoring: npm/@metamask/stake-sdk@0.2.13

View full report↗︎

Next steps

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/foo@1.0.0 or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

[amitabh94]

Very minor comments but LGTM! Great job on this !

[amitabh94]

@SocketSecurity ignore-all

@metamask/Stake-sdk uses fetch to communicate with staking backend api service

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: e456aba
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/80f0b695-883b-4c72-ad90-dc75c324d69f

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 9902f6c
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/fac9ceda-aa89-46c5-b620-80f2302c87f3

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
3 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
72.3% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[NicolasMassart]

Looks good to me.
Thanks for you work and sorry for the delay on review.