-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Upgrading Appium test failing #10826
Conversation
Bitrise✅✅✅ Commit hash: 0a99eff Note
|
Could we run an upgrade test again this branch to verify this fix? |
Bitrise❌❌❌ Commit hash: 18605e8 Note
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@Cal-L the upgrading appium test passed, but the test run failed because of the core ios test suite failed. Apparently it was some setup issue |
Bitrise✅✅✅ Commit hash: c4f3568 Note
|
@Cal-L just passed the smoke test |
This is PR updateds the change log for 7.30.0 and generates the test plan here [commit.csv](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/release/7.30.0/commits.csv) --------- Co-authored-by: metamaskbot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com> <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** This PR updates the browserstack url used for the Upgrade test <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> ## **Related issues** Fixes: ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
<!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** The previous URL used in the build uploaded to Bitrise for version 7.29 was not found during the upgrade test run. This update ensures that the correct URL is now used <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> ## **Manual testing steps** https://app.bitrise.io/build/c8e58868-3e6c-4d67-a194-dc84c0a62edc ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I’ve followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@Cal-L https://app.bitrise.io/build/6d4eb117-a80c-4d7f-99f6-46354741a811 upgrade appium test |
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Description
Currently, both upgrading Appium test are failing on main. For MultipleAccounts.feature, when the test relogin to the app after upgrading to the app. This is happening because there is a step that execute the Android Back button. We need to remove that step.
For ConnectedTestNetwork.feature, the test are failing because whats new modal is not longer appearing after connected to the test network. We need to remove that step.
Related issues
Fixes:
Manual testing steps
Screenshots/Recordings
Before
After
Pre-merge author checklist
Pre-merge reviewer checklist