Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Restrict Distance Label to AtB Contracts Only #5617

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

IllianiCBT
Copy link
Collaborator

Previously, the distance label was added for all contract types, which was incorrect as non-AtB Contracts do not track system. This change ensures it is only displayed for AtB contracts.

Previously, the distance label was added for all contract types, which was incorrect. This change ensures it is only displayed for AtB contracts, aligning with the intended behavior.
@IllianiCBT IllianiCBT self-assigned this Jan 2, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 10.05%. Comparing base (559019b) to head (26a92c5).
Report is 59 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #5617   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     10.05%   10.05%           
- Complexity     6074     6076    +2     
=========================================
  Files          1073     1073           
  Lines        141323   141324    +1     
  Branches      20629    20630    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits          14215    14217    +2     
+ Misses       125740   125734    -6     
- Partials       1368     1373    +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Sleet01 Sleet01 merged commit f1fb126 into MegaMek:master Jan 2, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants