Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Work towards Java 17 #4111

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Jun 29, 2024
Merged

Work towards Java 17 #4111

merged 14 commits into from
Jun 29, 2024

Conversation

rjhancock
Copy link
Collaborator

Initial work to move to Java 17

@rjhancock rjhancock marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2024 21:29
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 10.30%. Comparing base (398cbd4) to head (fcc420a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #4111   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     10.30%   10.30%           
  Complexity     5810     5810           
=========================================
  Files           925      925           
  Lines        126085   126085           
  Branches      18691    18691           
=========================================
  Hits          12999    12999           
  Misses       111811   111811           
  Partials       1275     1275           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rjhancock
Copy link
Collaborator Author

All checks pass.

@HammerGS HammerGS merged commit c025250 into MegaMek:master Jun 29, 2024
3 checks passed
@HammerGS
Copy link
Member

Given the approvals and moving up the 0.50.0 release merging these.

@rjhancock rjhancock deleted the java-17 branch June 29, 2024 21:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants