Project check

[davidwaroquiers]

Adding check on version compatibility between the runner and the workers.
This would have probably allowed to prevent #157 from happening (at least finding out the reason maybe ?).

[gpetretto]

I have added some comments on the changes. I think there is a bug in the original version of the check. Maybe it can be fixed in this PR.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 68.00000% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.08%. Comparing base (294e8f4) to head (794ba90).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/jobflow_remote/config/helper.py	65.11%	8 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
src/jobflow_remote/cli/project.py	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #158      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    72.82%   73.08%   +0.26%     
===========================================
  Files           47       47              
  Lines         6207     6249      +42     
  Branches       979      991      +12     
===========================================
+ Hits          4520     4567      +47     
+ Misses        1337     1329       -8     
- Partials       350      353       +3     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/jobflow_remote/cli/project.py	85.18% <85.71%> (+9.61%)	⬆️
src/jobflow_remote/config/helper.py	69.17% <65.11%> (+0.75%)	⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

[davidwaroquiers]

All good to me (just one small comment/question regarding the check_worker but I leave it up to you to take the decision to do anything or not, be it a comment or changing the code). Thanks! Can't approve my own PR :D