-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19.3k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Showing
1 changed file
with
4 additions
and
2 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9ab654a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the attention and fix.
However I noted that you applied the int16_t fix to my quick&dirty fix, i.e. the one where I split the calculation in 2 lines (I did it without understanding anything, it simply works).
This does not prove that int16_t is the solution (as my fix was already working) + is not so elegant (2 lines instead of 2) in my opinion.
If int16_t really works, why not applying it directly to the original single-line calculation?