Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A question about the 0 BTC here #636

Closed
poor-defined opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

A question about the 0 BTC here #636

poor-defined opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@poor-defined
Copy link
Contributor

I have a question about the "0 BTC " here.

Image

Is this a bug ?

@poor-defined poor-defined converted this from a draft issue Apr 28, 2024
@poor-defined
Copy link
Contributor Author

So is OP_return a type of out put? Not just an attribution of an output.
image

@poor-defined
Copy link
Contributor Author

Based on the proposal #644 , it's suggest to made an adjustment here.

Remove the Seal UTXO from the input column.

  1. Add "OP return" here

Image

  1. Add an external link icon to the BTC TX detail page on BTC explorer

Image

@Daryl-L
Copy link

Daryl-L commented May 28, 2024

@poor-defined poor-defined moved this from 🏗 In Progress to 📌CurrentWeek in CKB Explorer Jun 3, 2024
@poor-defined poor-defined moved this from 📌CurrentWeek to 👀 Testing in CKB Explorer Jun 3, 2024
@FrederLu
Copy link

Verified.

@FrederLu FrederLu moved this from 👀 Testing to ✅ Done in CKB Explorer Jun 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants