Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run CI against local lisk-service - Closes #3455 #4048

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 10, 2022

Conversation

fchavant
Copy link
Contributor

@fchavant fchavant commented Jan 6, 2022

What was the problem?

This PR resolves #3455

How was it solved?

Run CI against local lisk-service and lisk-core.

How was it tested?

https://jenkins.lisk.com/job/lisk-desktop/job/3455-core-service-ci/
Notes:

  • must run against 930-incorrect-transactions-filtering lisk-service branch for now;
  • that there are 2 failing tests.

@fchavant fchavant self-assigned this Jan 6, 2022
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 6, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@ManuGowda ManuGowda changed the title Run CI against local lisk-service Run CI against local lisk-service - Closes #3455 Jan 6, 2022
@ManuGowda ManuGowda requested a review from reyraa January 6, 2022 09:45
@fchavant fchavant force-pushed the 3455-core-service-ci branch 3 times, most recently from 6ba6d53 to 8cbdbd1 Compare January 10, 2022 14:01
@fchavant fchavant marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2022 14:01
@fchavant fchavant force-pushed the 3455-core-service-ci branch from 8cbdbd1 to b2201bc Compare January 10, 2022 14:03
@ManuGowda ManuGowda requested review from ManuGowda and removed request for reyraa January 10, 2022 14:04
Jenkinsfile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fchavant fchavant force-pushed the 3455-core-service-ci branch from 3c8e209 to a31ce95 Compare January 10, 2022 15:40
@ManuGowda ManuGowda merged commit 0590c7c into 3734-improve-e2e-test-suite Jan 10, 2022
@ManuGowda ManuGowda deleted the 3455-core-service-ci branch January 10, 2022 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants