-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 458
Implement sync function of legacy chain handler - Closes #7547 & #7486 #7541
Implement sync function of legacy chain handler - Closes #7547 & #7486 #7541
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall approach looks good to me, few comments
9936fb8
to
f50581e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Besides the open comments, LGTM. I'll have another review once the comments are closed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good to me, please add missing tests and we can finalize the PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Having another look.
3abd80e
to
fd754a8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one point otherwise lgtm
…ttps://github.com/LiskHQ/lisk-sdk into 7486-implement-sync-function-of-LegacyChainHandler
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great job @sitetester 👏
3e8ad88
into
feature/7136-support-legacy-blocks-and-transactions
What was the problem?
This PR resolves #7547 and resolves #7486
How was it solved?
syncBlocks()
function is commented with flow of syncing legacy blocksHow was it tested?