use table_hash to uniquely identify the table extraction #92
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hackaugusto
commented
Oct 11, 2024
| #[derive(Clone, Dbg, PartialEq, Deserialize, Serialize)] | ||
| pub struct SingleTableExtraction { | ||
| pub table_id: TableId, | ||
| pub table_hash: TableHash, | ||
| pub value_proof_version: MptNodeVersion, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Value extractions were previously identified with (table_id, last_changed_block_nr, state_root). With merge tables, this is no longer unique, so the ID was changed to (table_hash, last_changed_block_nr, state_root).
hackaugusto
force-pushed
the
hack-unique-extraction-id
branch
from
5b2a68f
to
431d086
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.