Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change suggested solved in README from GLPK to Tulip #232

Closed
laurentheirendt opened this issue May 11, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #265
Closed

change suggested solved in README from GLPK to Tulip #232

laurentheirendt opened this issue May 11, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #265
Assignees

Comments

@laurentheirendt
Copy link
Member

I think it is more appropriate to select Tulip as the suggested solver

@exaexa
Copy link
Collaborator

exaexa commented May 11, 2021

I'm not super-happy about tulip output for demonstration purposes (it's giving a lot of off-by-epsilon results), but yeah it can work

@laurentheirendt
Copy link
Member Author

hm, GLPK is definitely not the best. maybe another solver?

exaexa added a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2021
exaexa added a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2021
exaexa added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants